« Biglaw associate arrested in insider trading scandal | Main | Clicks, Clients, and Controversy: The Ethics of Paying for Client Leads »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cb84553ef0120a6ad9f77970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Blogging as grounds to oppose pro hac vice application?:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
John - Can you really characterize the motion to oppose as anti-blogging? Both attorney's seem to have clearly violated Rule3.6(a) by making extra-judicial statements that a reasonable person should know would have a prejudicial impact on the judicial proceeding. If they had held a press conference and made the same statements, would you still see it as "anti-blogging."
Posted by: Mike Gort | November 06, 2009 at 11:15 AM