General Links

« Biglaw associate arrested in insider trading scandal | Main | Clicks, Clients, and Controversy: The Ethics of Paying for Client Leads »

November 05, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cb84553ef0120a6ad9f77970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Blogging as grounds to oppose pro hac vice application?:

Comments

Mike Gort

John - Can you really characterize the motion to oppose as anti-blogging? Both attorney's seem to have clearly violated Rule3.6(a) by making extra-judicial statements that a reasonable person should know would have a prejudicial impact on the judicial proceeding. If they had held a press conference and made the same statements, would you still see it as "anti-blogging."

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment