« Indiana Center on the Global Legal Profession launches new web site (and call for list of centers about the legal profession) | Main | Law review circulation numbers, cooking the books, and legal ethics »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cb84553ef012877a98501970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Legal Zoom sued in class action for UPL:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
As I viewed this page, I thought it was amusing that the left column of the page included an "Ads by Google" which read "LegalZoom.com - Create Reliable Documents. Fast, Affordable & 100% Guaranteed." I hope the legal profession handles this suit better than the prior attempts to address companies that produced form books. I wish the legal profession could better educate the public on true value of a lawyer's work. I went to the legalzoom website and receive "specials" by email for prices that aren't much less than what I would charge for the same documents. The public, however, believes the marketing of LegalZoom and think they are getting the same quality as they would with a lawyer. The result: do-it-yourselfers will get things wrong and a litigation attorney will make far more than a planner would have charged.
Posted by: j.g. | February 24, 2010 at 09:18 AM