Carolyn Elephant, at My Shingle, renews the debate in light of New Yorks' "ethics app."
« Legal ethics odds and ends (January 17, 2012) | Main | Bring back the LLB? »
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
In my opinion, jurisdictions (such as Maryland)that decide to not make their ethics opinions available to the public fail in the obligation of transparency.
Posted by: Mike Frisch | January 17, 2012 at 10:19 AM
Since my post, I have been playing around with the app, searching for New York's rules on solo practice. While I consider myself reasonably informed, I was shocked to discover that the opinions addressed issues that I had not even thought about. While many lawyers couldn't care about ethics opinions, I think that many simply don't realize that a bar may have addressed an issue - like requiring advertising disclaimers - that a lawyer may not have thought about. Likewise, some lawyers are under the impression that certain practices like cloud computing or accepting credit cards are unethical - and the opinions offer a blue print on how to undertake these actions compliantly. It is an incredible tool and I think that all bars should follow this lead.
Posted by: Carolyn Elefant | January 17, 2012 at 11:15 AM
Thanks, Mike and Carolyn. I agree that transparency should be the norm. California has made its Publication 250 (our rules and statutes compendium) available on Kindle for just $4.99. Free would be best, but that's very low price for the value of all the gathering they've done, and the same publication is free as a pdf on the State Bar website.
http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2011/10/california-bars-publication-250-ie-its-rules-and-statutes-compendium-now-available-on-kindle.html
Posted by: John Steele | January 17, 2012 at 01:59 PM
When I wrote Trial Ethics (which nobody bought) Fortune and I put the Model Rules in the back of the book, and we had to pay! I was not amused. I was the Model Rules Chair in Kentucky and pushed the Rules through. I thought I might get a break. No Way! The ABA President was then, a Kentuckian (same now - wow). Anyway, the Pres. had no sympathy. I seem to recall that he later lost $50K in cash in a hotel. His clients money. I wonder if he filed one of those IRS things? Hmmm.
The Law is not a mere money getting trade. I think Socrates said that ... but they killed him, didn't they.
Posted by: Rick Underwood | January 18, 2012 at 07:53 AM
John,
I have no issue with paying $4.99 for an app - honestly, I would have paid $15 or $20 for the NYSBA app, it is that good. Five dollars is well worth the convenience for California lawyers to have the materials readily available and I think that anyone who can afford a smartphone can surely afford that price.
Posted by: Carolyn Elefant | January 18, 2012 at 10:19 AM