Resources for PR Teachers

General Links

« No vehicles in the park | Main | California Lawyer's article on Tom Frankovich (a lawyer who brings many small ADA claims) »

January 07, 2012

Comments

Monroe Freedman

He calls an ethics professor who he knows will give him the answer he wants -- that he need not recuse himself even when clearly required to do so. See 30 Okla. City Univ. L. Rev. 513, at 524-526 and 529-532.

Steven Lubet

"That means I have to take with absolute seriousness the obligation to sit as well as the obligation not to sit," he said, echoing sentiments also expressed by the Chief Justice in his report.

Rehnquist also invoked the "duty to sit" in Laird v. Tatum. But if you read the legislative history to the 1974 amendments to section 455, you will see that Congress clearly intended to abolish the "duty to sit."

Just sayin'.

Rick Underwood

Who they gonna call?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment