LEF Symposia

Resources for PR Teachers

Blog Founders

Active Bloggers (in order of joining)

Blogging Alumni

Academic Sites and Centers

Blawgs and Sites

Media Sites

Judicial Ethics

Ethics in Practice Areas

General Links

Legal Ethics Journals

Law Student Blawgs

Professional Organizations - Ethics Practice Sites

Bar Associations around the World

ABA / State Resources

« WSJ Law Blog, "Uncertain Prosepcts" for legal industry | Main | Interesting and somewhat heated discussion about office-wide DQ of Public Defender Offices in GA »

February 17, 2012

Legal ethics odds and ends (February 17, 2012)

  • Nola.com: Judge appoints prominent lawyers to represent indigent accuseds. (h/t: Above the Law) It looks as if the judge is trying to draw attention to the problem by invoking the traditional rule that lawyers should accept appointments when they can.
  • Jotwell: A positive review of Andrew Francis's new book on the legal profession in England and Wales.

 

JD Journal: Yet another political response against a University of Maryland law clinic that sues local industries.

 

 

Posted by at 08:30 AM |

Comments

Rick Underwood


In the journalists' book of verbals, why are lawyers always "prominent" and doctors always "well-respected"?

Posted by: Rick Underwood | February 20, 2012 at 06:59 AM

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

Posted by:  | 

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment