California has been auditing the CLE compliance records of its lawyers and has found that 15% couldn't prove that they were in compliance. About two dozen lawyers have been referred for discipline. Here's the new letter from the State Bar president to the heads of the local bar associations:
_________________________________________________
April 13, 2012 Re: MCLE auditing compliance
Dear Voluntary Bar Association Leaders:
I am writing to alert you that the State Bar is taking a more aggressive approach to auditing MCLE compliance than it has historically. All California lawyers need to be aware of this change in the Bar’s MCLE auditing process.
The result of the State Bar’s recent 2011 MCLE audit of one percent or 635 lawyers has confirmed the need for increased auditing. Of the 635 audited attorneys, 539 provided the necessary documentation showing full compliance. Of the remaining 96 attorneys, five have been suspended due to their inability to show any compliance. Most of the remaining 91 attorneys had minor reporting deficiencies and received a cautionary letter from our MCLE compliance group about future compliance. Approximately 25 of the 91 are being referred to the Office to Chief Trial Counsel for disciplinary action. Using simple math, we see that 15% of this reporting group were not in compliance.
This result is troubling and reaffirms the action being taken by the State Bar. In 2012, California attorneys can expect that five percent or roughly 3,000-4,000 lawyers to be audited. In 2013, the goal is to audit 10% which translates to 7,000-8,000 lawyers. Letters requesting proof of compliance for 2012 will be mailed in June.
The message is clear. California lawyers must fulfill and accurately document and report their MCLE requirements. No California attorney should be surprised if their compliance certificate is audited. For more information regarding MCLE requirements and reporting, visit the State Bar’s MCLE web page.
If you have any questions, please send an email to Carol Madeja, Managing Director of Bar Relations Outreach at carol.madeja@calbar.ca.gov.
Thank for your attention to this issue.
Sincerely yours,
Jon B. Streeter President The State Bar of California
Thanks for posting this. I'm not too surprised at the error rate (it's quite possible that someone cannot find some of the paperwork, three years later). I'm surprised at the high rate of people who could provide no proof at all that they had done any CLE. If you take the class from any provider, they can give you a copy of the MCLE certificate years alter (they also need to keep records).
Do you know if they intend to audit providers too?
Posted by: Judith_IP | April 24, 2012 at 08:29 PM
Judith_IP, I understand that a smaller audit of providers is taking place as well.
Posted by: John Steele | April 24, 2012 at 11:27 PM
Speaking of the California State Bar—The Recorder published a probing critique by Richard Zitrin, who sometimes contributes here. It seems not to have been widely publicized: access to The Recorder is Paid-subscription based. (I only discovered it during a complimentary trial subscription.) I published a synopsis "Esteemed legal ethicist Richard Zitrin lambasts California State Bar" at http://tinyurl.com/6lpgejl
Posted by: Stephen R. Diamond | April 25, 2012 at 08:07 PM