Resources for PR Teachers

« DOJ to appeal adverse ruling on Guantanamo access-to-counsel issue | Main | When Political Ads Lie to Children about Sex, Marriage and Everything Else »

November 05, 2012

Comments

Richard Painter

If she participated personally and substantially in the Gill case or any other case as a lawyer, she can't decide it as a judge. She is, however, free to decide the DOMA issue in any other case.

If she recuses from a case and the Court splits 4-4, DOMA is probably history.

Also I question the wisdom of the Court granting cert in a DOMA case when Justice Kagan would recuse and there are other cases in which she would not recuse.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe Share/Bookmark

Site Statistics