Illinois Bar Journal has the story: "AVVO.com's new online service allowing lawyers to quote fees for
prospective traffic-ticket clients sends the public the wrong message,
ISBA-member critics complain."
« Checking out finances before a lateral move -- law professor edition? | Main | Register now to attend ReInvent Law Silicon Valley 3.8.13 @ Computer History Museum »
The comments to this entry are closed.
To be honest I find it much more disconcerting that if you go to http://www.avvo.com, the headline says "Get free legal advice from top-rated lawyers." It's been a while since I was in law school, but my recollection is that if you provide "legal advice" whether free or not, you potentially establish an attorney-client relationship with the questioner. Is that no longer correct?
Posted by: Judith_IP | January 31, 2013 at 08:03 PM
As we used to say in the advertising racket, it's all about eyeballs.
Posted by: David Cameron Carr | February 02, 2013 at 12:19 PM