« British regulators shut down law firm |
| Politics within the DOJ - "Holder Encouraged Removal of Bush-Era Voting Section Chief, IG Report Found" »
Posted by John Steele at 10:17 AM | Permalink
While sampling trials make a lot of sense, the reality of MR 1.2 and MR 1.8(g) entirely prohibits aggregate settlements or waivers of individual decisional rights. Two of my recent Moral Compass columns address the problems with these issues.
See http://www.law.com/jsp/ca/PubArticleCA.jsp?id=1202580438284 on December 7, 2012,
and http://www.law.com/jsp/ca/PubArticleCA.jsp?id=1202581404563 on December 14, 2012.
That doesn't mean that trial sampling can't work, and it may be, carefully done, one of the most viable solutions.
Richard Zitrin |
March 13, 2013 at 02:16 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.