A nunc pro tunc prospective client? In this disciplinary opinion, the Indiana Supreme Court conceded that the information that a woman shared with a lawyer had not been shared in the role of prospective client. Later, the woman asked the lawyer for a recommendation, the lawyer recommended a second lawyer in the same firm, and the woman hired that second lawyer. A few months after that, while in a social setting, the first lawyer revealed the woman's confidence to a third party. The court ruled that the first lawyer breached 1.9(c). (h/t:Indiana Law Blog)