I've long belived that (1) students have far more control over the curriculum at law schools, (2) in exercising their choice the students should listen carefully to alums, profs, judges, hiring partners, etc., and (3) law schools should meet the students at least halfway by adjusting the course offerings to accommodate the students' desires. Here's an article by Fried, Coates and Spier, with the results of a survey of lawyers who hire Harvard law grads, asking what courses the Harvard students should take. Below are two graphs of the recommended business courses and non-business courses.
[Update; the second graph below was added after Steve Gillers' comment. It shows recommended skills for all practice groups. The third graph, likewise added after Steve's comment, shows recommended non-business courses for all practice groups. The article also has graphs with recommendations for just the litigation practice group.]
(h/t: Otherwise)