In an ethics alert written by my partner, Ron Minkoff, he discusses a recent decision by the New York Court of Appeals on an legal fee issue that "has long bedeviled civil rights and employment lawyers - and their clients." Where a contingency agreement entitles an attorney to a percentage of the "net sum recovered," does that amount include both the damages award and any statutory attorneys' fee award?
As explained in the alert:
In Albunio, the attorney argued that "net sum recovered" included both the damages award ($986,671) and the attorneys' fee award ($296,826.04), which would have led to an approximate $400,000 recovery on the trial fees alone. The Court of Appeals disagreed. After reiterating the well-established principle that the attorney has the burden to show that fee contracts (and particularly contingent fee contracts) are "fair, reasonable, and fully known and understood by their clients," the Court held the attorney had not met that burden, and indeed had not even mentioned the possibility of a statutory fee award in the retainer. As a result, the Court concluded that the client could not have been on notice that the term "net recovery" would include a statutory fee award. Thus, the attorneys' contingent fee was limited to one-third of the damages award, approximately $330,000.
The attorney may be able to alter this result by making clear in his retainer agreement that the net sum recover includes any attorney fee award, as explained in the alert:
Can the attorney vary this by being more explicit about the fee award in his or her retainer agreement, even going so far as to get the full court-awarded counsel fees plus a share of the damages? The answer is clearly yes. But the Court cautioned attorneys "that such an arrangement would be subject to requisite scrutiny under applicable laws and rules controlling the reasonableness of attorney compensation." In some ways, this is not much of a limitation at all, since courts rarely interfere with contractual fee arrangements. But we do urge lawyers who do this kind of work to exercise caution in making these rich arrangements, especially when dealing with less-educated or less-sophisticated clients. Moreover, arrangements which simply make clear that the attorney is entitled to one-third of the statutory fee award and one-third of the damages will probably be considered acceptable.
The full text of the alert can be found here.
If you would like to be included on Frankfurt Kurnit's ethics alerts, please email me at [email protected].