Legal Ethics Forum: South Carolina: LegalZoom is not the the Unauthorized Practice of Law

Active Bloggers (in order of joining)

Blawgs and Sites

Media Sites

Judicial Ethics

Ethics in Practice Areas

General Links

KMAX Blog Links

Academic Sites and Centers

Legal Ethics Journals

Law Student Blawgs

Professional Organizations - Ethics Practice Sites

Bar Associations around the World

Canadian Bar Association
Commonwealth Lawyers Association
Counseil National des Barreaux (France)
European Union Bars and Councils
Federation of Law Socities of Canada
General Council of the Bar of South Africa
Hong Kong Bar Association
Hong Kong Law Society
International Bar Association
Irish Bar Council
Laurel Terry's Global Legal Practice Resource Page
Law Society of England and Wales
Law Society of Ireland
Law Society of Northern Ireland
Law Society of Scotland
Law Society of Singapore
Law Society of South Africa
New Zealand Law Society
The Bar Council (UK)
The Faculty of Advocates (Scotland)

ABA / State Resources

« ABA Formal Opinion on the Monitoring of Jurors' Internet Presence | Main | "Judge Vaughn Walker tells his side of Prop. 8 trial" »

April 24, 2014

South Carolina: LegalZoom is not the the Unauthorized Practice of Law

Jordan Furlong has a nice analysis of the South Carolina Supreme Court's conclusion. LegalZoom's press release is here.

(I couldn't find the order from the South Carolina Supreme Court that LegalZoom references in its press release. If anyone has a link, please pass it along.)

UPDATE: The ABA Journal has published the findings and recommendations here.

Posted by Andrew Perlman at 04:01 PM | Permalink

Legal Ethics Forum