My short commentary on the role of bias in the PACE trial has been published by the Journal of Health Psychology. The piece develops an analogy between the role of judges and investigators in research trials, concluding that latent or implicit bias needs to be addressed in both sorts of trials, and suggesting that the recusal standard under U.S. law -- whether "impartiality might reasonably be questioned" -- may be useful in both contexts.
Here is the gist:
Investigator bias and the PACE trial - Mar 07, 2017